What’s the difference between Virtual Private Servers and Shared Hosting? Virtual Private Servers are physical server computer partitioned into multiple servers so that each server has the appearance and capabilities of running on its own dedicated machine. This virtual server can run its own operating system, and can even independently reboot once the system is needed to be refreshed. Customers or subscribers have an access to the operating system and can install almost any software that runs on the OS. Other subscribers will not worry if other subscriber will have problems with their website and system that is running on the VPS.
Maybe the disadvantage here is that due to the number of virtualization clients running on a single machine, a VPS generally has limited processor time, RAM, and disk space. And also due to its isolation costing is much higher than shared hosting.
On the other side Shared Hosting uses only one dedicated servers in catering all website hosting subscribers. This causes for a limited space and accessibility. The only problem with shared hosting is that once there’s a problem all website hosting subscriber won’t be able to access their websites.
So which hosting will you choose? Me, now I know what the difference is and once I raised enough bucks to finance my website hosting I would definitely choose VPS. Fortunately there’s a website that I bumped into and I think they offer much greater value than any other VPS. They’re offering their VPS for a low cost of $29.95 per month. And they are using linux virtual dedicated servers which you can add any types of control panel like Plesk, cPanel, and DirectAdmin. To top it all they offer unmetered traffic and there are no hidden charges. So, for me after I have raised enough bucks I would definitely get VPS.
.
August 15, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment