Maybe the disadvantage here is that due to the number of virtualization clients running on a single machine, a VPS generally has limited processor time, RAM, and disk space. And also due to its isolation costing is much higher than shared hosting.
On the other side Shared Hosting uses only one dedicated servers in catering all website hosting subscribers. This causes for a limited space and accessibility. The only problem with shared hosting is that once there’s a problem all website hosting subscriber won’t be able to access their websites.
So which hosting will you choose? Me, now I know what the difference is and once I raised enough bucks to finance my website hosting I would definitely choose VPS. Fortunately there’s a website that I bumped into and I think they offer much greater value than any other VPS. They’re offering their VPS for a low cost of $29.95 per month. And they are using linux virtual dedicated servers which you can add any types of control panel like Plesk, cPanel, and DirectAdmin. To top it all they offer unmetered traffic and there are no hidden charges. So, for me after I have raised enough bucks I would definitely get VPS.
.
No comments:
Post a Comment